Are you a fan of mathematics?

It has often been said that mathematics is actually the language of God — as everything can be explained through numbers, formulas and equations.

That with the right formula — we can figure out the mathematic equation for everything.

Well, we here at FreedomWire have just cracked one of the most important codes in today’s politically-charged environment, ever…

The equation for winning.

That’s right, there is an absolute and measurable equation for winning an argument or at least getting whatever you want in the 21st century…

And it’s as easy as A + B(C) = X.

Liberals have already mastered this formula for getting what they want, and it may be time for conservatives to start studying up — because our own equation doesn’t seem to be working.

The equation conservatives have been using is: A + B/C = X…

While similar to the liberal-mastered equation — there are different values for A, B and C — which is why liberals are winning in the court of public opinion.

So, let’s first go over the equation that conservatives have been using as their winning formula…

A + B/C = X.

A = an event or subject of discussion.

B = logic.

C = The U.S. Constitution.

So, take a subject, add logic divide said logic by whether or not the argument is validated or invalidated by the Constitution, and you will arrive at the invariable correct answer to any controversy.

Take the gender pay gap…

The logic is — when broken down, the statistics that take into account the fact that women often work less to take care of their families or stay-at-home mothers are taken out — and we compare profession to profession, or same job to same job, often times the woman makes MORE money than the man.

Divide this logic by the 14th Amendment and there you have your answer: The pay gap exists — just in the opposite direction.

Or…

Let’s take gun rights.

The logic is — the founding fathers wanted future citizens armed and ready to fight any attack from the outside, this is true…

But the truth of the matter is, the men that wrote the Constitution and the Bill of Rights wanted future citizens armed to protect themselves and their liberties from domestic tyranny even more.

They didn’t want America to devolve into another Revolutionary War.

Take said logic for gun rights, divide it by the 2nd Amendment and there you have your answer: The 2nd Amendment is all the reason one needs to own whatever gun they so choose. Automatic or otherwise.

However, these arguments for logic and constitutionality seem to be falling on deaf ears.

That’s because the equation that liberals use is actually a strong formula for victory.

Of course, the values they use to get the W is a little different…

A + B(C) = X.

A = an event or subject of discussion.

B = emotion.

C = politicization of the subject.

So, take the event or subject of discussion, add the emotionally-charged politicization of said event and that will bring you to illogical, yet inarguable answer.

For instance…

A movie…

Take a movie with a female lead, but a terrible script — get angry and say the only reason people aren’t liking it is because they’re sexist and hate a woman in power — and walk away smugly with the win.

Or take Trump’s wall…

Get angry about the fact that Trump is keeping out voters for your party and label anybody who supports said wall a racist and saunter off with pride in your victory.

Are you getting it?

Let’s try one more…

How about taking a stat like: Most firemen are both male and white…

First, disregard the fact that these are the people that are willing to put their lives at risk to save others…

Then add anger that the entire profession must be the perfect example of systemic racism — and skip away feeling good about putting that racist conservative in their place.

This may sound like hyperbole or parody — and it’s supposed to be — but when you really think about it…

Is it far off from what is really going on?

This is why mainstream media pushes the leftist narrative — emotion sells.

Controversy sells.

Facts, logic — that’s boring…

Who wants to be factual when you can signal your own virtue.

Why try to find common ground when you can feel superior or that, morally, you’re above the person you’re having a conversation with?

Look at social media…

What are the liberals actually looking for? A way to fix what is wrong? Or just social validation, likes and upvotes?

The left doesn’t want to fix anything…

If they did, what would there be to bitch about?

But man, does that equation work for them, or what?

And who said you wouldn’t need algebra after high school?

 

“Prejudice is a great time saver. You can form opinions without having to get the facts.” – E. B. White