Racism is a hot-button topic these days.

See, all throughout my youth and right up until 2012, it truly seemed like America as a whole was steadily moving away from the sins of the past.

However, everything changed after the Trayvon Martin shooting and racial issues started moving back to the forefront of our country.

It begs the question…

Are we more racist now than we were over the past 50 years?

My answer would be “absolutely not,” but if you were to look at the streets of some of the Democrat-led cities, you may think differently. Based on the reactions of many of the “protestors” out there, you’d think we were still under Jim Crow.

But that simply isn’t the case…

We’re more open and accepting as a country than we’ve ever been – but for some reason, that’s not good enough for people.

The problem is that what they want isn’t feasible.

What’s The Endgame Here?

They want ZERO racism in the world, but the sad reality is that you can’t control what’s in a man’s heart. It would be awesome if we could get rid of racism for good – but the fact is that racism, in one form or another, will always be with us.

That should be abundantly clear to them, as even some of the most prominent anti-racists are themselves deeply racists.

Odds are you’ve never heard of Ibram X. Kendi, but it’s important to know who he is, because he just showed the world just how racist an antiracist can be.

Kendi is the director of the Center for Antiracist Research at Boston University, but he may be one of the biggest racists going today.

Now, it may be hard to reconcile how the director of an Antiracist Research project can be racist, but once you hear his words, you’ll more than likely understand.

What did Kendi say?

Well, after Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett as the next Justice for the Supreme Court, Kendi took to Twitter to give us his innermost thoughts on the presumptive new SCOTUS Justice, her mixed family, and the color of her skin.

Racism Is A TWO Way Street

Referencing Coney Barrett’s two adopted children, Kendi said, “Some White colonizers ‘adopted’ Black children. They ‘civilized’ these ‘savage’ children in the ‘superior’ ways of White people, while using them as props in their lifelong pictures of denial, while cutting the biological parents of these children out of the picture of humanity.”

So much for being an antiracist, right?

There is so much to unpack there – but the big takeaway is that apparently, white people can’t adopt black kids because they only want them as “props.”

Kendi continued, “And whether this is Barrett or not is not the point. It is a belief too many White people have: if they have or adopt a child of color, then they can’t be racist.”

Ummmm, isn’t the point of being a racist that you DON’T like people of another color?

Would a racist adopt children of another color to raise in a loving home?

Probably not…

Just as a racist probably wouldn’t have people of color as their friends.

Calling ACB a “White colonizer” is racist because that’s assuming something about her simply due to the color of her skin.

And this guy gets paid by an American university to research antiracism?

Is it a self-study?

Or is there something that he can teach by being a racist subject himself?

It’s hard to understand Liberals with their incredible level of hypocrisy these days.

 

“Freedom and justice cannot be parceled out in pieces to suit political convenience. I don’t believe you can stand for freedom for one group of people and deny it to others.” – Coretta Scott King